5) Leadership Style And Employee Engagement
Leaders play an important role in employee engagement and becoming the company's best employer. According to Hewitt, (2014) Employee Engagement Degree shows that leaders hold the key to employee engagement. Leadership means motivating people to do their best to achieve the desired results. It involves formulating and communicating a vision for the future, motivating people, and ensuring participation (Dixon, 1994). For example: Tim Cook is the CEO of Apple, the most valuable company in the world. He took over Apple after the company's founder Steve Jobs. Cook helped Apple complete the transformation after Jobs' death, as well as develop new product lines and open Apple retail stores in China (cmoe.com, 2020).
Hay (2002) pointed out that many employees “resigned because they were dissatisfied with their boss”. That is, the behavior of the leader will not only affect the results of the entire organization and customers, but also affect the attitudes and behavioral results of employees. Some researchers believe that leadership is one of the biggest factors affecting employees in the workplace and employee engagement (Attridge et al., 2009). For example: Sheryl Sandberg has been the chief operating officer of Facebook since 2008. She founded a non-profit organization Lean In, named after her bestseller. She has always been an influential advocate for women in business. She successfully transitioned from government work in the Ministry of Finance to the technology industries of Google and Facebook (cmoe.com, 2020).
Leadership skills (Dixon, 2001)
● Motivate others.
● Persuade others to be willing to act in a different way.
● Be clear about what needs to be done and why.
● Communicate a sense of purpose to the team.
● According to (Tamkin et al, 2010), leaders cannot create performance by themselves, but achieve performance through their influence on others.
● Let the team take action to complete the task.
There are six basic leadership styles, table 1 indicated the summary of Emotional Leadership styles.
Table 1: Summary of Emotional Leadership Style
Leadership |
Styles EI Competencies |
Climate Impact |
Objective |
When Appropriate |
Visionary |
Self-confidence; empathy; change catalyst |
Most Positive |
Mobilize others to follow vision |
When change requires a new vision or when a clear direction is needed. |
Coaching |
Developing others; empathy; emotional self-awareness |
Highly positive |
Build strengths for the future |
To help an employee improve performance or develop long term strength |
Affiliative |
Empathy, building bonds; conflict management |
Highly positive |
Create harmony |
To heal rifts in a team or to motivate during stressful times |
Democratic |
Collaboration; team leadership; communication |
Highly positive |
Build commitment through participation |
To build buy -in or consensus or to obtain valuable input from employees. |
Pacesetting |
Conscientiousness; drive to achive; initiative |
Highly Negative |
Perform tasks to a high standard |
To get quick results from a highly motivated and competent team. |
Commanding |
Drive to achieve. Initiative, Emotional self-control |
Strongly Negative |
Immediate compliance |
In a crisis, to kick -start a turnaround, or with problem employees |
Source: (JALM, 2017)
Goleman Leadership Theory
According to Goleman (2000) there are six leadership styles: compulsory, authoritative, friendly, democratic, leading and coaching (Table 1 gives a brief description of each style). This type stems from research in the business field. Each style is based on a combination of emotional intelligence capabilities. Although there is still controversy, the extent to which emotional intelligence affects effective leadership (Waterhouse, 2006) There is no doubt that there is a link between emotional intelligence and effective leadership, at least in its changing style (Barling et al., 2000).
Table 2 Goleman’s theory of leadership
Leadership Style |
Main Characteristics |
The Style In Phrase |
Coercive | Require immediate compliance, have a coverall negative impact on the organization’s climate, and perform well in the event of a crisis or workers problem. |
Do What I Tell You |
Authoritative Mobilizes | If you need a new perspective or a new direction, you can make people develop in the ideal direction, especially for excellent work. |
Come with me |
Affiliative | When people face difficulties, they focus on harmony and build emotional bonds that perform well. |
People come first |
Democratic | If you need to build a buy in or reach a consensus, or need the input of valuable team members, you can reach consensus and work successfully by participating |
What Do You think |
Pacesetting | Style sets high standards of performance, works effectively with motivated and capable people, and they know how to achive results from them |
Do It, as I do, now |
Coaching | To de work develop talent for the future, if they need to help others improve performance or establish long-term advantages, their work is particularly good. |
‘Try This’ |
Source: Based on (Goleman 2000)
Reference list
Aon Hewitt. (2014). Trends in global employee engagement. Retrieved on July 15, 2015, from 2014-trends-in-globaleployee-engagement-report
Attridge, M. (2009). Measuring and managing employee engagement: research and business literature review. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health
Bakhtari, H., 2005. The influence of culture on management style: A comparative study of management styles in the United States and the Middle East. International Management and Organization Studies,
Barling J., Salter F., Kelloway E. K. (2000), Transformational leadership and EI: An exploratory study, "Journal of Leadership and Organizational Development"
Dixon, NF (2010) The Psychology of Military Impotence, London, Pimlico
Gardner L., Stough C. (2002), Examining the relationship between the leadership and emotional intelligence of top managers, "Journal of Leadership and Organizational Development
Goleman D. (2000), Leadership to Get Results, "Harvard Business Review
Hai, M. (2002). Survival strategy in the talent war. International career development,
Tamkin, P, Pearson, G, Hirsh, W and Constable, S (2010) Exceeding Expectations: Principles of Outstanding Leadership, London, Work Foundation
Waterhouse L. (2006), Multiple Intelligences, Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review, "Educational Psychologist
I agree with you Nimna, According to the CIPD (2012: 13): ‘Engagement has become for practitioners an umbrella concept for capturing the various means by which employers can elicit additional or discretionary effort from employees – a willingness on the part of staff to work beyond contract.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. Kahn (as cited by Sapna, 1990) proposed that leadership has the greatest potential to influence follower feelings of psychological safety by providing a supportive environment in which one feels safe to fully engage in a task.
ReplyDeleteYes, Agreed Nuwan. Maduka & Okafor (2014) remarks that, this is where the challenge arises to the management in order to understand and identify the correct driving force which encourages the willingness of employee, to enhance the employee performance. Also Ovidiu (2013) suggests that management can simply focus on two aspects of which, one is to concentrate in reducing the factors that causes job dissatisfaction while the second is to concentrate in improving the motivating factors along with the employee empowerment which eventually leads to employee motivation, along with improved performance.
DeleteAgreed.
ReplyDeleteRothwell (2002, p.32) stated “As different sectors of the economy confront shortfalls of experienced talent, the leaders in those organizations will most likely be compelled to take more aggressive steps to attract and retain talent” which explains the importance of leadership in maintaining employee engagement.
I agree with your views and Armstrong (2012) states that motivation is concerned with the strength and direction of behaviour and the factors that influence people to behave in certain ways. The term ‘motivation’ can refer variously to the goals individuals have, the ways in which individuals chose their goals and the ways in which others try to change their behavior.
DeleteI agree that, leaders hold the key to employee engagement. However, according to Agrawal (2017) leadership does not only mean motivating people to do their best. Leaders who support the behavior of employees/people under him in task delegation and performing the activities will lead to positive engagement with them as well.
ReplyDeleteYes, Agreed Shanil. This reason has led management to create an competitive edge over other companies as Janine (2019) states that the motivation being a driving factor which enables a behavioral change towards attaining individual goals, can be used as the carrot in front of rabbits excluding the stick, as it produces and improves better performance removing the fact of fear.
DeleteYes, agree with your point of view."Effective leadership provides vision and direction for employee development"(Souba, 2011). According to the annual report 2019/20 of Sri Lankan Airlines, many leadership development programs conducted to take up the next level of leadership. “Leading during challenging times” program for Airport Customer Service managers and " Competency development for Engineering Management" program combining with the Post Graduate Institute of Management for the Engineering Managers of the E-3/ L-3 levels to be groomed and developed as sector specialists within the organization.
ReplyDeleteAgree with you, According to Dobre, (2013) almost all organizations is in a competitive environment, all organizations want to be successful. In order to that, the organization should create a strong and positive relationship with their employees and direct them towards goal achievement. In order to achieve their goals and objectives, organizations develop strategies to compete in highly competitive markets and to increase their performance. However, few organizations consider the human capital as being their main asset, capable of leading them to success or if not managed properly, to decline. If the employees are not satisfied with their jobs and not motivated to fulfill their tasks and achieve their goals, the organization cannot attain success.
DeleteFurthermore, engagement and leadership are closely related. It is leaders’ duty to nurture employees into their duties, encourage and motivate teams into great performance. But often the control and power that comes with leadership can turn the role sour. This often happens, when leaders start to treat employees disrespectfully (Bounti, 2019)
ReplyDeleteThank you Hemachandra. Evita (2011) emphasizes that a truly motivated employee workforce reflects a competitive organization with higher productivity, efficiency and quality with creativity along with happy workable environment, filled with positive energy. For this reason Mohsen et al (2017) considers such motivated employees as the engine of the organization.
DeleteWonderful blog! Employee engagement activities at the workplace can lead employees to be stress-free and energetic. The simple approach to engaging employees in fun activities and games. An employee engagement company in India, help various corporate and organizations to organize team-building, employee engagement and reward & recognition events.
ReplyDeleteEmpower your employees and drive business growth with our customizable engagement strategies. Trust our expert team to create a workplace culture that inspires and motivates your employees to do their best work. For more details about our best Employee Engagement Company in India, visit our website!
ReplyDelete